Self Signed X.509 Certificates
- Canonical Telco
Channel | Revision | Published | Runs on |
---|---|---|---|
latest/stable | 264 | 11 Mar 2025 | |
latest/stable | 265 | 11 Mar 2025 | |
latest/candidate | 265 | 10 Mar 2025 | |
latest/candidate | 264 | 10 Mar 2025 | |
latest/beta | 265 | 10 Mar 2025 | |
latest/beta | 264 | 10 Mar 2025 | |
latest/edge | 267 | 11 Mar 2025 | |
latest/edge | 266 | 11 Mar 2025 | |
1/stable | 263 | 11 Mar 2025 | |
1/stable | 262 | 11 Mar 2025 | |
1/candidate | 262 | 10 Mar 2025 | |
1/candidate | 263 | 10 Mar 2025 | |
1/beta | 262 | 10 Mar 2025 | |
1/beta | 263 | 10 Mar 2025 | |
1/edge | 285 | Yesterday | |
1/edge | 284 | Yesterday | |
1/edge | 247 | 03 Mar 2025 |
juju deploy self-signed-certificates --channel 1/stable
Deploy universal operators easily with Juju, the Universal Operator Lifecycle Manager.
Platform:
self-signed-certificates Tracks and Compatibility
This document seeks to clarify which track should be used when deploying a new self-signed-certificates
charm.
The names of the tracks can be confusing.
- The
latest
track is actually a legacy track that should no longer be used where possible. Charms should migrate to the1/stable
track when possible.- It is not compatible with requirer charms using V4 of the tls-certificates library and APP mode.
- The
1
track is the current track and should be used for all new deployments.
The charm is able to run on any cloud and substrate that Juju supports, be it a k8s container or a VM.
Charmhub Track | Juju Version Compatibility | Recommended for new deployments |
---|---|---|
1/stable | Juju 3.1+ | Yes |
lastest/stable | Juju 2.9+ | No |