SeaweedFS
| Channel | Revision | Published | Runs on |
|---|---|---|---|
| latest/beta | 8 | 26 Sep 2025 | |
| latest/edge | 9 | 26 Sep 2025 |
juju deploy seaweedfs-k8s --channel beta
Deploy Kubernetes operators easily with Juju, the Universal Operator Lifecycle Manager. Need a Kubernetes cluster? Install MicroK8s to create a full CNCF-certified Kubernetes system in under 60 seconds.
Platform:
A stand-in for s3-integrator + (micro)ceph for testing purposes.
Purpose
This charm is intended to use as a stand-in for s3-integrator + (micro)ceph for testing purposes. When testing charms, instead of deploying (micro)ceph, s3-integrator, setting config options and running the sync-credentials action, this charm mimics the s3 relation interface and provides an s3 endpoint.
Compared to s3-integrator
Relation data
This charm does not use the s3 library. Instead, it renderes the relation data itself. For a related charm, relation data may look like this:
- relation-id: 7
endpoint: s3
related-endpoint: s3-credentials
application-data:
access-key: placeholder
bucket: s3-credentials-7
endpoint: http://swfs-0.swfs-endpoints.welcome-k8s.svc.cluster.local:8333
secret-key: placeholder
Note that the bucket name is automatically derived from the relation id. No config options needed.
Bucket name
In the past there has been some confusion about who decides on the bucket name - the requesting charm (e.g. mimir, loki, tempo), or the s3-integrator charm. It seems like everyone agrees now that it's the s3-integrator where the bucket name should be set (via config option).
In this charm, the same principle holds, but there is no config option for bucket name, because:
- For testing purposes, we don't care that the bucket name is not fixed.
- This way we could relate multiple charms to the same seaweedfs charm, unlike s3-integrator where each app (mimir, loki, tempo) have their own s3-integrator due to different bucket names.